IHS Markit Technology is now a part of Informa Tech. The majority of the research portfolio is available on this site. For access to Energy & Power and Cost Benchmarking & Teardown Analysis, please visit benchmarking.ihsmarkit.com. For access to updated Automotive content, please visit autotechinsight.ihsmarkit.com.

Market Insight

Epic Games’ attempt to go fee-free on Google Play indicates disappointing Android performance

December 17, 2019


Want to learn more?
Have an expert contact you.

There is a long-running dispute between Google and Fortnite creator Epic Games, which revolves around the 30 percent cut Google takes when Android apps are officially listed on its app store Google Play. This fee encompasses both premium titles and in-app purchases.

In August 2018, Epic opted to boycott Google Play and instead, Fortnite players on Android had to download the title from publisher’s own website. This allowed the company to pocket 100% of the revenue.

However, in December 2019, Epic submitted Fortnite to be listed on the Play Store, on the condition that it could use its own payment platform and be exempt from Google’s 30 percent fee. Its submission was rejected by Google, who stated that it expects all developers to participate under the same terms.

Epic’s fight to change the industry standard masks mobile decline

Epic Games CEO Tim Sweeney is a vocal critic of the 30 percent cut typically taken by third-party store fronts, which is now widely accepted as the industry standard. He has called for companies such as Steam to rethink their revenue share models and commit to providing developers with a more substantial cut.  The Epic Games Store on PC – a Steam competitor – takes a lower 12 percent cut, with 88 percent going to the developer. Despite Epic’s aggressive approach which includes pursuing paid exclusives, other storefronts on console and mobile have remained resistant to any significant change to the 70/30 revenue share model.  

In October 2018 – and likely in response to the upcoming Epic Games Store launch - Steam revised its revenue model slightly. For games generating more than $10m, Valve would take a reduced cut of 25 percent, dropping to 20 percent on earnings above $50m. While not a seismic change, this move was beneficial for big sellers, and perhaps demonstrates that Valve is not immovable on this subject.

Sweeney argued that his intention was to trigger a general change in smartphone industry practices, rather than pursue a special exception for Epic Games and Fortnite. However, Fortnite’s declining performance on iOS suggests that Epic may well need Google Play support to recapture growth.

Fortnite on iOS is down $100m net revenue since Q3 2018

As with other battle royale titles, Fortnite has seen a general decay across PC and console platforms since its mid-2018 peak. However, whilst PUBG Corporation’s PUBG IP has flourished in its transition to smartphone via Tencent, Epic’s title is flatlining. According to Priori Data, in Q3 2019, Fortnite saw a decline of -65% year-over-year in net revenue on iOS. It now generates just over a third of the revenue it did at peak, and Q4 looks to remain flat, with marginal recovery from the Star Wars event.

As App Store users are monetized far more effectively than those on Google Play, and due to a lack of easy access, it is likely that Fortnite is generating less than half its total mobile revenue on Android.

Is Epic finally looking to emerging markets for growth?

If Fortnite were to launch on Google Play, it would likely see a surge of interest in emerging markets such as India due to greater exposure and accessibility. IHS Markit Technology data shows that 95% of smartphone devices in India are Android, and high-growth territories across South America and Southeast Asia are also Android-first. These markets have already been tapped by competing publishers and titles, such as PUBG Mobile and Garena’s Free Fire, which are highly visible on Google’s app store: PUBG Mobile now even has a lite version.

Fortnite is available to download on Android from the Epic Games website, but its lack of presence on Google Play will have been damaging. Although its battle royale competitors have already established audiences across high-growth territories, none really replicate the Fortnite aesthetic. Its global renown coupled with the mobile-first approach of these games markets could attract new users of the IP, in addition to enticing across the small number already playing on other platforms.

Android Store delayed on the roadmap for Epic Games Store

An Android version of the Epic Games Store has been a target since the store’s inception, and was listed on the roadmap from the beginning. At the end of August, however, its position was pushed back into “Future Development”. This suggests that improving the PC storefront is now the strategic priority. This shift in approach may reflect Epic’s experience of trying to get the Android version of Fortnite into gamers’ hands, and the marketing and resource investment needed to make this happen. Epic’s subsequent attempt to distribute Fortnite through Google Play Store reinforces the view that an Android storefront from Epic is a long way off.

Smartphone revenue share format seems unlikely to change

It seems unlikely that Google will be willing to revise its 70/30 revenue share model in the near future, especially as it gives developers the option of distribution via their own channels – something which is currently not even permitted by Apple on iOS. As such, Epic will have to decide if the exposure and potential new growth afforded by the Play Store is worth surrendering 30 percent of its Fortnite revenue.

 

Geography
Global
Organization
Valve
Research by Market
Media & Advertising
Category
Games
Share facebook Twitter Google Plus Linked In Add This Contact Us